Politics make me queasy.
Jun. 3rd, 2010 01:10 pmI rejected a project wonderful ad just now.
I've had to reject some in the past - just completely non-genre, spammy-looking, not the kind of ad I want on my site, and usually, I sort of wonder if I should've, afterward. Maybe I shouldn't be so strict about the genre, or let PW worry about legitimacy of the actual sites.
But this...
It was a book called Repuglicans - basically monster-ized portraits of prominent Republican part members.
The description at Amazon:
I'm not Republican, by any stretch. I get embarrassed for the state when Sarah Palin is mentioned in the news (I had SUCH high hopes for her, but ugh). I'm not liberal, either, but that's not really the point.
The point is that a very gifted artist spent enough time to produce an entire book of hateful artwork. I mean... I get political humor and satire and such, I can even understand horror, though it's not to my taste. But this feels cheap, ugly and just mean. Is there really an audience for this? Would you really buy it FOR the Republican who works in the next cubical? What would that say to them about how you feel about their point of view?
I have a good mix of liberal and conservative on my friendslist, and I find it enlightening to read the things they're passionate about.
But the thing that really gets under my skin - and has caused one of the few unfriendings I've done on Livejournal - is the villianization* of the other side.
It's not really us versus them. It never has been. It's bad ideas believed passionately by flawed people that we don't have to like. But stripping them of their humanity so its easier to hate them? That's damaging - and not to them, but to ourselves. When we can stop seeing the sympathetic side in someone else, we lose our ability to see it in ourselves.
I would rather have my advertising boxes sit empty than promote things like that.
*No, spell-check, not vulcanization. That's a Star Trek rant...
I've had to reject some in the past - just completely non-genre, spammy-looking, not the kind of ad I want on my site, and usually, I sort of wonder if I should've, afterward. Maybe I shouldn't be so strict about the genre, or let PW worry about legitimacy of the actual sites.
But this...
It was a book called Repuglicans - basically monster-ized portraits of prominent Republican part members.
The description at Amazon:
It's completely unfair and not balanced whatsoever! Pete Von Sholly, creator of CAPITOL HELL, and political commentator Steve Tatham bring you cutting edge political satire just in time for the mid-term elections. So, if you're a card-carrying Republican, stop reading now. If not, you must get this book. Von Sholly puts UGLI into the Republican party with his all-new versions of top party leaders and apparatchiks. See Sarah Palin rendered as a vampire. McCain as a three-eyed freak. Glenn Beck as a half-brained zombie. Also including Lou Dobbs, Michele Bachmann, John Boehner and many, many others. Sholly's imagery coupled with wry commentary by Steve Tatham is a perfect gift for the Republican sitting in the cubicle next to you!
I'm not Republican, by any stretch. I get embarrassed for the state when Sarah Palin is mentioned in the news (I had SUCH high hopes for her, but ugh). I'm not liberal, either, but that's not really the point.
The point is that a very gifted artist spent enough time to produce an entire book of hateful artwork. I mean... I get political humor and satire and such, I can even understand horror, though it's not to my taste. But this feels cheap, ugly and just mean. Is there really an audience for this? Would you really buy it FOR the Republican who works in the next cubical? What would that say to them about how you feel about their point of view?
I have a good mix of liberal and conservative on my friendslist, and I find it enlightening to read the things they're passionate about.
But the thing that really gets under my skin - and has caused one of the few unfriendings I've done on Livejournal - is the villianization* of the other side.
It's not really us versus them. It never has been. It's bad ideas believed passionately by flawed people that we don't have to like. But stripping them of their humanity so its easier to hate them? That's damaging - and not to them, but to ourselves. When we can stop seeing the sympathetic side in someone else, we lose our ability to see it in ourselves.
I would rather have my advertising boxes sit empty than promote things like that.
*No, spell-check, not vulcanization. That's a Star Trek rant...
no subject
Date: 2010-06-03 09:43 pm (UTC)I'm glad you don't! Some ads that get through ad services end up being malware -- with flash being common anymore, it's very easy for miscreants to put tag-along trojans in with their ads. I suspect that, even if ad services are vetting their advertisers, the advertisers who push malware insert it after the vetting.
And, well, it's advertisements, which aren't particularly important when it comes down to it. No sense in letting ones run that make you feel gross. I can see why you nixed this one.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-03 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-03 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-03 11:15 pm (UTC)I'm with you btw; I'm probably liberal-ish, but I just don't get an artist sitting down and making an entire book about HATE. That's what it is. Whatever happened to live and let live? Just.. bleh.
(I'm using your icon of happy, by the way. See?Cat agrees.. :p )
no subject
Date: 2010-06-04 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-04 12:43 am (UTC)repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-04 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-04 03:32 am (UTC)repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-04 03:34 am (UTC)Repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-04 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 01:15 am (UTC)I try to avoid political stuff because it just frustrates me.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 01:17 am (UTC)*facepalm*
I wish I could run my business the way the government runs theirs. But if I did they'd have no money because there would be no one responsible enough to make any. :P
repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-05 02:09 am (UTC)Re: repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-05 02:17 am (UTC)And you're welcome. I wish you luck with your endeavors, even if I don't agree with them. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 02:17 am (UTC)Re: repuglicans
Date: 2010-06-05 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-05 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 08:30 pm (UTC)