I only want to save the world
May. 7th, 2008 12:17 pmI am being very firm with myself. I will not waste more frustration on the Orphan Works issue. No, my article will not get much press and very few people will post links to it, because it is not FULL OF CAPS and it doesn't foretell doom. It's also accurate. How dull. If I feel like sharpening a spork, I shall instead work on the Fair Use article - much more useful.
Come on, Mr UPS guy! Where's my tea?? Orders of this size and relative risk are always nail-biting.
Come on, Mr UPS guy! Where's my tea?? Orders of this size and relative risk are always nail-biting.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-07 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-07 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-07 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 09:20 am (UTC)I have deep concerns about it, and on balance think its a bad thing. But its not ZOMG UR GONNA LOSE UR COPYRIGHT.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 04:43 pm (UTC)What *I'd* like to see added to the bill is a clause that the infringer isn't protected unless they had no clear and equal alternate. That would protect things that the infringer could have substituted with properly licensed work and allow things like historical or personal photographs.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-08 10:32 am (UTC)But I do have a question. Given that it's on the Zine, and the Zine's archives are only available to registered folks and some parts just to subscribers, will the article "disappear" in June?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-09 04:46 pm (UTC)SPORK! DOOM!
Date: 2008-05-12 10:30 pm (UTC)Here's something to add to your spork collection: http://xkcd.com/419/
No accuracy whatsoever,
Mia :D
Re: SPORK! DOOM!
Date: 2008-05-14 12:31 am (UTC)