*cries*

Feb. 28th, 2005 07:56 am
ellenmillion: (RAGE)
[personal profile] ellenmillion
Comment spammed again. A few hundred, this time. (edit: more than 350...)

So much for whatever I was going to do this morning...

Oh, and great... they're using a rotating IP, and posting faster than I can delete the things.

Date: 2005-02-28 09:47 am (UTC)
ext_87252: http://www.janetchui.net (Default)
From: [identity profile] marrael.livejournal.com
Sorry... :< I had one spammer on my journal today and I thought that was bad.

Date: 2005-02-28 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellenmillion.livejournal.com
Bleh. Very, very frustrating. I've turned off all commenting (adopting) for the morning and have to hope they'll get bored and leave the site alone so I can turn them back on this afternoon...

Date: 2005-02-28 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pers1stence.livejournal.com
Does the regular commenting get enough activity of sufficient interest/usefulness to make it worthwhile having to deal with comment spam?

Date: 2005-02-28 10:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellenmillion.livejournal.com
It's actually vital to the adopting service as it stands right now - the 'comments' are actually adoptions, and a piece with a 'comment' shows up as adopted on the site. Which makes the comment spam particularly frustrating, of course, since I've got to keep the stupid spam comments deleted or all the portraits are showing as adopted.

Date: 2005-02-28 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fireborn.livejournal.com
(This has probably already been considered/discussed, but....) Have you thought about going with something that would require a registration before commenting? Slows the process down a bit from the user's end but speeds it up considerably from yours.

Date: 2005-02-28 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellenmillion.livejournal.com
I like the idea! It's a ways outside of my coding comfort, unfortunately. (Honest, I just fiddle with codes until they break, go back a step, and that's where I stay...) And yay - Jennie just uploaded a script that should stop anyone trying to comment with more than X number of links. (Which would have caught every one of these spams, but not a single valid adoption!)

Date: 2005-02-28 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
Are you still using Greymatter, or are you using something else? You might want to think about changing to a different blog software...

Date: 2005-02-28 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellenmillion.livejournal.com
Yes, still with greymatter - but not for long! Jennie's working on a mySQL-based thingy with a HUGE improvement in flexibility that's more capable of dealing with the number of entries that I've got... the searches are getting spine-numbingly slow, so it was time for a change no matter what. In the meantime, there's a code in place now that won't allow comments with any links in 'em, and that should put a cap on the spam comments. (Try it! The error message is pretty funny. :P)

Date: 2005-02-28 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gossamerfaery.livejournal.com
UGH! What a pain in the *@%!!!! May their keyboard rise up and beat them in the head;)

Profile

ellenmillion: (Default)
ellenmillion

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 07:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios