I am in the market for a new laptop.
My current machine, God Rest Her, is an Acer Aspire 17something, and I loved it to PIECES. I covet another 17" laptop, but am open to getting a 15" and buying a monitor for home. It doesn't have to be exceptionally portable - I don't travel with it a lot, but I DO need to be able to take it with me for a day doing graphics or drafting at someone else's office and still be comfortable.
I do NOT NOT NOT want Windows Vista. Whoever at MS had the genius idea that 'let's release an operating system that doesn't run AutoCAD!' should be shot. Preferably in the kneecaps so they have lots of time in agony and will never do so again. Also, it's slow and everything I've read says I don't want this system. I will pay extra for a laptop that runs XP, SP2, or I will get something with Vista and wipe it clean to start over with again and take that hassle into my pricing consideration. Vista is decidedly not a selling point.
My needs are not terribly extensive. I do run large art and CAD programs, but not intensive gaming 3D graphics stuff. 1 Gig of RAM is minimum. Big harddrive a plus. Full keyboard and numberpad a must. Windows is a must (this isn't a 'convert Ellen to Apple' opportunity. :P).
I have a decent budget. I'd like to pay less than $1000, but for the right machine with the right stuff, I could go a little higher.
What would you get? Any words of warning?
My current machine, God Rest Her, is an Acer Aspire 17something, and I loved it to PIECES. I covet another 17" laptop, but am open to getting a 15" and buying a monitor for home. It doesn't have to be exceptionally portable - I don't travel with it a lot, but I DO need to be able to take it with me for a day doing graphics or drafting at someone else's office and still be comfortable.
I do NOT NOT NOT want Windows Vista. Whoever at MS had the genius idea that 'let's release an operating system that doesn't run AutoCAD!' should be shot. Preferably in the kneecaps so they have lots of time in agony and will never do so again. Also, it's slow and everything I've read says I don't want this system. I will pay extra for a laptop that runs XP, SP2, or I will get something with Vista and wipe it clean to start over with again and take that hassle into my pricing consideration. Vista is decidedly not a selling point.
My needs are not terribly extensive. I do run large art and CAD programs, but not intensive gaming 3D graphics stuff. 1 Gig of RAM is minimum. Big harddrive a plus. Full keyboard and numberpad a must. Windows is a must (this isn't a 'convert Ellen to Apple' opportunity. :P).
I have a decent budget. I'd like to pay less than $1000, but for the right machine with the right stuff, I could go a little higher.
What would you get? Any words of warning?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-15 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-15 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-15 11:18 pm (UTC)I promise, it's completely painless. I bought my first Mac last December. The learning curve isn't so bad and I love being able to run Mac, Linux and Windows programs beautifully on one machine.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 04:31 am (UTC)You could also get a kick-ass non-Mac machine for under $1k, install linux as the main OS (I recommend Ubuntu for non-linux geek user-friendliness), and still go the VMWare route. That way you'd still have a single machine that runs concurrent sessions of Vista, XP, etc., giving you access to all your programs, no matter which version of Windows is best for each individual application.
As for Macs being underpowered - eh. If you're not gaming, a Mac is probably more than sufficient power for what you need. No laptop's going to crunch as well as a desktop for the same amount of money.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 04:21 am (UTC)She asked for opinions, I gave mine. If it doesn't suit her needs, it doesn't suit her needs. No reason to get abusive over it.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 04:38 am (UTC)And it's only worth it if you're actually interested in running OSX, which she clearly stated she is not.
And wow, "abusive"? Could you be more dramatic? I suppose replying again means I'm a terrorist now too, huh?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 08:35 am (UTC)Oh, wait.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 01:35 am (UTC)Dell Inspiron 1721, AMD Turion 64 x 2 TL-60 (2.0GHz/1MB)
2GB, DDR2, 667MHz 2 Dimm
ATI RADEON Xpress1270 256MB HyperMemory
160G 5400RPM SATA hard drive
8X DVD+/-RW Dual Layer Drive
Dell Wireless 1490 802.11a/g Mini Card
It's a Windows Vista Home Premium, though, but maybe you can wipe it and install XP (although, I think that voids the warranty, sort of thing). It was $1392.96 with tax. I'm loving it, but I got it primarily for handling large digital artwork files and such...I also got the Photoshop Elements added and got a wireless mouse, which made my total $1510 and a bit.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 03:52 am (UTC)Are you using an older version of Autocad? I've been running Vista for months, and I wouldn't go back for anything. It's true there were some growing pains, and some things do take getting used to again (office 2007, for example) but all in all it's been an awesome experience. It's also a good bit faster than any of my XP ever were. If it's just autocad compatibility, I might be able to furnish you with a copy of AC2008.
That aside... I dunno that you're going to find what you want for less than a grand, regardless. Especially not with your needs by way of graphics, processing, HD space, etc.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 07:25 pm (UTC)Then again, I'm a gamer, and I like to have a system that can reliably (which rules out bootcamp) run Windows games. -.-
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:50 pm (UTC)