Oh, I got an advance copy of the newest Harry Potter book. Not impressed. I can't believe that JK put Harry and Hermoine together... ...and killed off Snape! Good riddance, but she'll have to come up with a new oily guy now; I can't picture the next book without one. Ron's personality change was a big relief, and her treatment of mermaids was refreshing.
I'm just teasing, of course... I never even finished the fourth book. :P Is there even going to BE a next book? I'm just a goober with a weird sense of humor...
I'm just teasing, of course... I never even finished the fourth book. :P Is there even going to BE a next book? I'm just a goober with a weird sense of humor...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 02:41 am (UTC)I'm the daughter of a professional, published SF/Fantasy writer, I KNOW these things.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 03:36 am (UTC)...must...kick them out...of the gene pool....geck! *falls over* :P
And I shall make them hear it! RAWRGH!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 04:11 am (UTC)Also, Miz Ellen? I was SO UPSET at first. >_< I had to make a friend (who doesn't have any desire to read the books, ever) read behind the cut to see if you said "Just kidding" as I desperately hoped you did. >_> (I didn't see the "more" part of "More spoilers behind the cut" and read, oh man did I kick myself. >_> )
Someone's already passing around a LJ icon which is a photo of what claims to be page 606 from HP:HBP with a spoiler (or hoax) which reveals a death. I'm hoping that is a hoax because it's kinda hard not to read text on an icon if you don't know it's supposed to be a spoiler.... >_<
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:12 am (UTC)::falls over dead::
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:23 am (UTC)::chases Ellen with a giant butterfly net::
no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-16 08:49 pm (UTC)Honestly though, I have to disagree with those saying the writing's gone downhill. Yes, book 5 was over long and could have been chopped in half. But they were pushing for a fast street date. And she is edited, just not heavily, which frankly, from a buissness stand point I kinda understand. After all, the books'll sell no matter what so....
Anyways, book six is much tighter, if more disturbing. I still think she's one of my fav aouthors for getting into the head of a realiatic teenage boy.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-17 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 01:42 am (UTC)